Search Suggest

Knowledge Articles | The Atlaris Journal

Why Context Matters More Than You Think An Invitation To Serious Scholarship

Discover why systematic contextual analysis isn't just valuable it's essential infrastructure for reliable knowledge circulation in an age of information abundance
💬 300 ⏱ 12 min read
The Atlaris Journal | A Framework for Scholarly Excellence

The Cost of Misinterpretation When Scientific Ideas Lose Their Way

There's a concept in social psychology that most researchers have encountered the bystander effect. What most citations miss is how meaning drift damages entire research programs

💬 3 ⏱ 12 min read

Beyond Citation What It Means To Truly Understand a Scientific Idea

You can access more information today than any scholar in history Millions of papers sit behind a few keystrokes. Yet genuine understanding has become rarer

💬 2 ⏱ 12 min read

Toward Democratic Legitimacy in AI Alignment

The Normative Imperative of Social Value Alignment in AI Systems From Individual Preferences to Democratic Technology Design

Full Citation : Gabriel, I., & Ghazavi, V. (Forthcoming). The Challenge of Value Alignment: from Fairer Algorithms to AI Safety. In The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics Oxford University Press.

Published : 30/01/2026

View publication & Download

Quote 

Ghazouani, M. (2026) “The Normative Imperative of Social Value Alignment in AI Systems From Individual Preferences to Democratic Technology Design,” The Atlaris Journal .

Abstract

This editorial analysis examines the normative framework proposed by Gabriel and Ghazavi regarding the "social value alignment" of artificial intelligence systems deployed in pluralistic societies. Critiquing the insufficiency of predominant "one-to-one" technical alignment methodologies and preference aggregation models, the text argues that current approaches fail to address the legitimacy deficits inherent in multi-stakeholder deployment contexts. By synthesizing insights from deliberative democratic theory, the work posits that consequential AI systems must embody normative principles that receive wide endorsement from those whose lives are powerfully affected by their operation. This constitutive claim shifts the alignment discourse from technical safety optimization toward a strict political legitimacy requirement, distinguishing between individual user satisfaction and the ethical obligations owed to diverse communities. Ultimately, this foundational critique offers a rigorous benchmark for evaluating the sociotechnical validity of emerging AI governance structures and democratic technology design .

Venue : Science

Post a Comment